Are journalists on Twitter only following each other and
preferable only those of the same media? That is an interesting question
because the answer could shed some light on pluralism in the media and about
the independence of journalists. The graph above may give an answer; it shows
the network of Twitter relations between the top 500 South African Journalists
on Twitter. These 506 tweeps share 2503 relationships; resulting in a density
of 9%. The colors show the different
groups in the network and the size of the names reflects the authority of the
tweep in the network.
Published at Journalism page Wits University, Joburg, SA: http://www.journalism.co.za/index.php/news-and-insight/insight/169-general/4991-sa-journalists-on-twitter-who-do-they-relate-to.html
Published at Journalism page Wits University, Joburg, SA: http://www.journalism.co.za/index.php/news-and-insight/insight/169-general/4991-sa-journalists-on-twitter-who-do-they-relate-to.html
Twitter network of 500 SA journalist. size set to authority
and color to group
Elite
Because the density in the network is quite low, one cannot
conclude that there is closely connected elite among the tweeps. However if we look at various groups-that is
tweeps how are closer connected- the picture changes.
We see for example a small red group (2% of the tweeps)
which is composed completely of the Caxton media; and bigger dark blue one of 11%
dedicated to media24. The biggest, purple, group of 33% is the hard news media
in South Africa. The green group of 28%
is a mixture of news and opinion and has the biggest number of freelance
journalist. Finally we have a yellow group (18%) more dedicated to
business/finance and IT, and the light blue group of 7% related to sports.
Within these groups journalist follow each other more closely; that is the
density in these groups are higher than in the overall network.
Authority is another characteristic in the network.
Authority can be compared with Google Pagerank; the higher a page ends in a
Google search the more imported the page is. Tweeps with a higher authority are
for example more followed or re-tweeted.
They are more central persons or nodes in the network. Here are the top
20 of tweeps:
Top 20 Authority on Twitter
|
|
T_name
|
Medium
|
ferialhaffajee
|
City Press
|
nicdawes
|
Mail & Guardian
|
gussilber
|
Freelance
|
mandywiener
|
EWN
|
phillipdewet
|
Mail & Guardian
|
stephengrootes
|
EWN
|
maxdupreez
|
|
hartleyr
|
Sunday Times
|
adriaanbasson
|
City Press
|
702johnrobbie
|
Radio 702
|
bruceps
|
Business Day
|
verashni
|
Mail & Guardian
|
mandyldewaal
|
Daily Maverick
|
antonharber
|
Freelance
|
carienduplessis
|
City Press
|
art2gee
|
Freelance
|
guyberger
|
personal on journalism
|
shapshak
|
Stuff
|
akianastasiou
|
Radio 702
|
brankobrkic
|
Daily Maverick
|
Compared to the result of a similar research by the British
newspaper The Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/apr/11/journalists-twitter-following
), this South African picture is not much different. Journalists have a
tendency to follow each other, in general, but more closely in groups.
Data Journalism
This graph is an example of data journalism: finding a story
in a pile of data. This new species in journalism is getting highly popular (http://memeburn.com/2012/03/data-journalism-where-coders-and-journos-meet/
). Social network analysis like analyzing this twitter network is a special
branch. The central question in network
analyses is: how many different walks you can make through a network of 500
persons, on the condition you visit them all? Many, of course, but some will be
shorter than others; you will meet certain persons more than others (more
central so more authority). Social
network analysis is a matter of mathematics (graph theory). And the biggest problem is to give a
meaningful interpretation to the numbers. The groups for example are
constructed on basis of an algorithm that calculates a higher density. But the
question is who these groups are? I have tried to give an interpretation on
basis of the biggest number of media in each group.
Howto
How to make a graph like this? First you have to get the
data. Luckily there is good and updated list of journalist on Twitter: Hacks
List (http://hacks.mediahack.co.za/
). Now you have to scrape the data from
the web page with Outwit Hub( a plugin for Firefox). Next clean-up the data
with Google Refine. In the end you have a spreadsheet with twitter names,
number of tweets and followers. Interesting but we need the relationships
between them. I used NodeXL, a template
on Excel, to download and import the data from Twitter. Time for coffee, but
this will take some hours. We can do the social network analysis with NodeXL,
but the graphs are not so beautiful, and I like another program-Gephi-more. So
Import the data in Gephi.
Within Gephi we make calculations for groups and for
authority, with the build in algorithms. These are only numbers in spreadsheet.
A picture, a graph, is more interesting. So we ask Gephi to draw a graph of the
network where group is set to color and authority to size of the nodes.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten
Opmerking: Alleen leden van deze blog kunnen een reactie posten.